IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/innchp/978-3-319-32392-3_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Governance of Nanotechnology: Context, Principles and Challenges

In: Managing Risk in Nanotechnology

Author

Listed:
  • Steven M. Hankin

    (Institute of Occupational Medicine)

  • Sheona A. K. Read

    (Institute of Occupational Medicine)

Abstract

Progress towards harnessing and utilising the unique properties of current generation nanomaterials in new commercial and industrial applications is developing across a broad range of areas. Despite the massive expectations of nanotechnologies and growth in its application, there is a widespread belief that the hopes of this emerging technology will only fully materialise if its development takes place responsibly. The extensive development of nanotechnologies and nano-enabled products has been accompanied by considerable concern regarding the possible risks for the environment, health and safety (EHS) and broader ethical, legal and social issues (ELSIs) associated with its application and use (or misuse). Research conducted to date has shown the potential risks of nanotechnologies to be associated with a high degree of complexity and uncertainty, with no clear-cut cause-and-effect relationships. As such, understanding and managing the EHS and ELSI implications of this emerging technology is considered to represent a global and trans-boundary task and may require a novel multidimensional approach to risk assessment and risk management within a governance framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven M. Hankin & Sheona A. K. Read, 2016. "Governance of Nanotechnology: Context, Principles and Challenges," Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, in: Finbarr Murphy & Eamonn M. McAlea & Martin Mullins (ed.), Managing Risk in Nanotechnology, chapter 0, pages 29-49, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-32392-3_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32392-3_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gita Ghiasi & Catherine Beaudry & Vincent Larivière & Carl St-Pierre & Andrea Schiffauerova & Matthew Harsh, 2021. "Who profits from the Canadian nanotechnology reward system? Implications for gender-responsible innovation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7937-7991, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-32392-3_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.