Author
Abstract
The preceding chapters have examined how AI reshapes organizational architectures and introduces new categories of risk that require deliberate governance. A further dimension of organizational transformation, analytically distinct yet deeply connected to both, concerns the fate of human creative and judgmental capacities within firms increasingly organized around algorithmic intelligence. This chapter addresses a question that is at once theoretical and managerial: as AI systems assume expanding roles in pattern recognition, prediction, and operational decision-making, what becomes of the distinctively human contributions—reativity, moral reasoning, intuition, and interpretive judgment—that have historically constituted the core of professional and managerial work? The argument developed here resists two symmetrical distortions that recurrently appear in both academic and practitioner debates. The first is the substitution thesis, which holds that sufficiently advanced AI will eventually replicate or surpass human cognitive capacities across all organizationally relevant domains, rendering human judgment progressively redundant. The second is the irreplaceability thesis, which holds that human creativity and judgment are categorically beyond algorithmic reach, such that concerns about their erosion are misplaced. Both positions are analytically inadequate. The substitution thesis underestimates the structural dependence of algorithmic systems on human-defined objectives, interpretive frames, and institutional contexts. The irreplaceability thesis underestimates the degree to which human cognitive practices are already shaped, constrained, and in some cases diminished by the organizational integration of AI. A theoretically adequate account must engage the actual mechanisms through which human and algorithmic cognition interact within organizational settings, and must identify the conditions under which this interaction enhances or degrades the quality of human judgment and creative output.
Suggested Citation
Domitilla Magni, 2026.
"Preserving Human Creativity and Judgment in AI-Driven Firms,"
Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management,,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-032-35262-0_9
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-35262-0_9
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-032-35262-0_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.