IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/fgfchp/978-3-032-17538-0_11.html

Differences in the Screening Criteria between US and Continental European VC Investors

Author

Listed:
  • Joern Block

    (Trier University
    Erasmus University, Erasmus Institute of Management (ERIM))

  • Walter Diegel

    (Trier University)

  • Christian Fisch

    (University of Luxembourg (SnT))

  • Alexandra Moritz

    (Koblenz University of Applied Sciences)

Abstract

Research on venture capital (VC) decision-making has largely concentrated on investors within single countries or regions, with few comparative studies exploring differences in screening criteria across countries. This study fills this gap by examining how VC investors in the US and Europe prioritize key investment criteria, particularly revenue growth and international scalability. Employing a multimethod approach, we first conducted interviews with 19 VC experts to identify seven critical screening criteria. These criteria were then evaluated in a choice-based conjoint experiment involving 430 participants. Our findings highlight differences in investment priorities. US investors place significantly greater emphasis on high revenue growth rates while European investors prioritize international scalability. To further explore and interpret these differences, we conducted follow-up discussions with 11 VC investors from both regions. European investors stress that startups must be internationally scalable from an early stage. In contrast, US investors prioritize rapid revenue growth as a key indicator of market traction and investment potential. Additionally, European VCs adopt a more conservative investment approach while US VCs often embrace a higher-risk, high-reward strategy. Understanding the differences in investment preferences and criteria can help entrepreneurs tailor their strategies to better align with the expectations of US and European investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Joern Block & Walter Diegel & Christian Fisch & Alexandra Moritz, 2026. "Differences in the Screening Criteria between US and Continental European VC Investors," FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship,, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:fgfchp:978-3-032-17538-0_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-17538-0_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fgfchp:978-3-032-17538-0_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.