IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/eurchp/978-3-030-65085-8_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Level of Similarity of Team Management with the Use of System of Organizational Terms

In: Eurasian Business Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Olaf Flak

    (University of Silesia in Katowice)

Abstract

This paper aims at estimating a level of similarity in team management in a given project in two dimensions of managerial actions: types of management techniques used by managers and their sequence. In management studies, there is extensive research on management styles, management skills, and management roles. Despite this, they are still not sufficient to estimate the similarity of team management. To solve the problem of ambiguity of these terms, more efficient methodology of managerial work was introduced. This methodology is called the system of organizational terms, and it allows nonparticipating observations of team managers and their members by online management tools, which record human actions. The system was used in the research of five teams of students, who were given the same project to conduct for one month. Their teamwork was recorded by online management tools in content and time domains; however, in this paper, a level of team management similarity is considered only in the field of the time domain. The main conclusion from the research is that there are no similarities in team management done by the managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Olaf Flak, 2021. "Level of Similarity of Team Management with the Use of System of Organizational Terms," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, in: Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis & Ender Demir & Sofia Vale (ed.), Eurasian Business Perspectives, pages 19-35, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurchp:978-3-030-65085-8_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-65085-8_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurchp:978-3-030-65085-8_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.