IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/euhchp/978-3-030-15024-2_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Different Views of Socialization Strategies in Germany Since the First Socialization Debate

In: The First Socialization Debate (1918) and Early Efforts Towards Socialization

Author

Listed:
  • Karl-Heinz Schmidt

    (University of Paderborn)

Abstract

The socialization of resources and economic activities was intensely discussed in Germany during the 19th century and after the First World War. The following article aims at analysing determinant factors of the former debate and at demonstrating reasons for a new debate on socialization in the “European Future”. The introduction and short remarks on strategies of socialization are followed by comments on the concepts of selected authors about the process of socialization. At first, some of Franz Eulenburg’s publications from after the First World War are presented. They dealt with diverse measures to cultivate economic life towards socialist order. Three problems are identified: wealth, distribution, and power. The author wants to investigate the logic of socialization, the metapolitical aspect behind concrete measures. He also identifies a decisive production problem: how to reduce the “dead weight costs” of socialization? Eulenburg presumes that the socialization program can be carried out through a long-term process of organic development only, that is to say, not revolution, but evolution! The second author considered is Eduard Heimann. The comments on his studies of capitalism and socialist order demonstrate Heimann’s conceptual ideas on sociological unification of the people and central economic planning. Bookkeeping is recommended as a most important instrument for decision making. The author basically distinguishes “Socialism from below” and “Socialism from above”, both being necessary for an efficient and social economic order. According to Heimann it should be possible to realize a socialist order based on “Freedom in Gemeinschaft”. Furthermore, three authors of the later 20th century are considered: Schumpeter (1946), Rittig (1956), Novy (1978). Schumpeter’s statement that the socialist democracy will not imply any considerable approach to the ideals of classical theory, may also be recognised as a basic point of discussion in Rittig’s articles on socialization (1956 ff) and in Novy’s monograph on strategies of socialization. According to Novy, there will be no easy way of reforms out of capitalism towards a functioning socialism. On the whole, the subsequent article points out in a nutshell that the considered authors prefer a long-term process of socialization based on solid economic theory that allows for effective measures of economic and social policy to open the door for the future development of peaceful socialization.

Suggested Citation

  • Karl-Heinz Schmidt, 2019. "Different Views of Socialization Strategies in Germany Since the First Socialization Debate," The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences, in: Jürgen Backhaus & Günther Chaloupek & Hans A. Frambach (ed.), The First Socialization Debate (1918) and Early Efforts Towards Socialization, pages 45-59, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:euhchp:978-3-030-15024-2_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-15024-2_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:euhchp:978-3-030-15024-2_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.