IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/csrchp/978-3-319-15838-9_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Defining a Methodology for Social Audit Based on the Social Responsibility Level of Corporations

In: Social Audit Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana Tiron-Tudor

    (Babes-Bolyai University)

  • Ioana-Maria Dragu

    (Babes-Bolyai University)

  • George Silviu Cordos

    (Babes-Bolyai University)

  • Tudor Oprisor

    (Babes-Bolyai University)

Abstract

Currently, global corporations face a series of challenges in terms of accountability towards the environment and society. One of the ways by which they could deal with these challenges is to introduce the use of social auditing to assist them to improve their reputation and the way they are perceived by all their stakeholders. Unfortunately, there is still no standard methodology for corporations to prepare their social audit report. This chapter seeks to fill this gap. It proposes a standardized methodology based on a disclosure checklist simulated on a range of sustainability/socio-environmental/corporate social responsibility set of information which companies provide in their annual reports. This methodology was developed based on a disclosure analysis using a sample of annual reports of the most responsible corporations worldwide. It was expected that these role model corporations when it comes to the best practice follow the same trendline regarding disclosures on sustainability/social responsibility information.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana Tiron-Tudor & Ioana-Maria Dragu & George Silviu Cordos & Tudor Oprisor, 2015. "Defining a Methodology for Social Audit Based on the Social Responsibility Level of Corporations," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Mia Mahmudur Rahim & Samuel O. Idowu (ed.), Social Audit Regulation, edition 127, pages 257-279, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-319-15838-9_13
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-15838-9_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-319-15838-9_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.