IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/csrchp/978-3-319-06308-9_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Assessing the Effectiveness of Reporting Systems: Why and How

In: Responsible Tourism and CSR

Author

Listed:
  • Mara Manente

    (CISET)

  • Valeria Minghetti

    (CISET)

  • Erica Mingotto

    (CISET)

Abstract

This chapter proposes and describes a methodology to assess the effectiveness of the reporting systems for responsible tourism and CSR available in Europe, the scope being to give tourism businesses a set of elements useful to choose the program that best responds to their characteristics and requirements. Through the application of a mathematical and multi-criteria decision model, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the main characteristics, strengths and weaknesses of every program have been evaluated and compared, according to different criteria. Better than a qualitative analysis, AHP analyses the performance of every alternative with respect to each parameter and finally calculates a value that expresses the overall quality and effectiveness of each system in assessing business responsibility. In particular, the main criteria that have been selected are as follows: the degree of attention paid by every program to all triple bottom line dimensions; the opportunity for small and medium-sized enterprises to apply the system; the integration between the “certification approach” and the “responsible tourism approach”; the transparency given by the type of auditing. The method selects the best reporting system to apply, according to the importance given to each criterion taken into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Mara Manente & Valeria Minghetti & Erica Mingotto, 2014. "Assessing the Effectiveness of Reporting Systems: Why and How," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Responsible Tourism and CSR, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 109-124, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-319-06308-9_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06308-9_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-319-06308-9_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.