IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/csrchp/978-3-319-00939-1_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

When Being a Good Company Isn’t Good Enough: The Malden Mills Case

In: Christian Ethics and Corporate Culture

Author

Listed:
  • Al Gini

    (Loyola University Chicago)

  • Alexei M. Marcoux

    (Loyola University Chicago)

Abstract

The story of Aaron Feuerstein is now old news but it was so spectacular in the late 1990s that it quickly made it into dozens of business ethics textbooks and anthologies. Until under his leadership as the President and CEO of Malden Mills Industries, Inc., a textile company (best known for Polartec) in Lawrence, Massachusetts, Malden Mills was taken by many CSR proponents to be the archetype of the socially responsible firm. However, the very virtues for which Malden Mills is lauded among CSR proponents are recognized also to be significant causes of Malden Mills’ recent bankruptcy and Feuerstein’s fall from leadership. Consequently, there is a strong argument to be made that passing the CSR test meant, for Malden Mills, failing the market test. Our discussion explores the implications of the principle ought implies can for CSR. If the Feuerstein-led Malden Mills is the archetype of a socially responsible firm, Malden Mills’ subsequent bankruptcy suggests some cherished notions of CSR must be reexamined in light of their failure to satisfy ought implies can. A CSR worth paying attention to ought to be mindful not just of the intentions that inform socially responsible action but also the effects of that action.

Suggested Citation

  • Al Gini & Alexei M. Marcoux, 2014. "When Being a Good Company Isn’t Good Enough: The Malden Mills Case," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Bartholomew Okonkwo (ed.), Christian Ethics and Corporate Culture, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 149-154, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-319-00939-1_10
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-00939-1_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-319-00939-1_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.