IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/csrchp/978-3-032-00086-6_6.html

A Rigid Dichotomy: Artificial Intelligence and Ethical Responsibility: Comparative Assessment of EU, UK, and US AI Policy Framework

In: Sustainability and Social Responsibility of the Media and in the Media

Author

Listed:
  • Adebimpe Adesua Lincoln

    (Robert Kennedy College)

  • Christian J. Lincoln

Abstract

This research provides a comparative assessment of Artificial Intelligence governance mechanisms adopted in the European Union, United Kingdom, and the United States. The rationale for the study stems from the fact that Artificial Intelligent technologies currently pose significant ethical risks to individuals, businesses, and the wider society. Furthermore, there is a dearth of legal regulatory framework in many countries, and where such frameworks exist, they lag behind advancements in technology due to rapid technological innovation. This research therefore highlights the importance of ensuring risks posed by Artificial Intelligence are identified and that strategies are proffered to mitigate these risks, thereby ensuring global justice in the development and deployment of Artificial Intelligent technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Adebimpe Adesua Lincoln & Christian J. Lincoln, 2026. "A Rigid Dichotomy: Artificial Intelligence and Ethical Responsibility: Comparative Assessment of EU, UK, and US AI Policy Framework," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Milan Todorovic & Samuel O. Idowu & Silvia Puiu (ed.), Sustainability and Social Responsibility of the Media and in the Media, pages 111-144, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-032-00086-6_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-00086-6_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-032-00086-6_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.