IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/csrchp/978-3-031-96205-9_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Critique of the Role of Social and Ethics Committees in Amplifying the Stakeholder Voice Under Company Law in South Africa: Lessons from the UK Corporate Governance Code

Author

Listed:
  • Mikovhe Maphiri

    (University of Cape Town)

Abstract

This chapter critically examines the role of Social and Ethics Committees (SECs) in amplifying the internal stakeholder voice within the framework of company law in South Africa, drawing insights from both primary and secondary sources of law, including the UK Corporate Governance Code. Through a comprehensive literature review, the chapter analyses the Companies Amendment Bill of 2021, which introduces significant changes to the Companies Act 71 of 2008, with a focus on its potential to strengthen stakeholder engagement through SECs. While the Bill aims to improve corporate governance by addressing existing legal ambiguities, the chapter argues that it still prioritizes shareholder interests, potentially at the expense of broader stakeholder involvement. The methodology involves a critical review of legal texts, statutory provisions, case law, and scholarly articles to explore how internal Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), facilitated by SECs, can enhance corporate accountability, transparency, and social responsiveness, thereby positively influencing company performance. The analysis critiques the Bill’s provisions on SEC composition, qualifications, and reporting, identifying both strengths and weaknesses in fostering effective stakeholder engagement. By drawing on the UK Corporate Governance Code and other relevant legal frameworks, the chapter advocates for a more balanced and inclusive approach in South African company law that ensures the voices of all stakeholders—employees, communities, and shareholders—are heard and respected in corporate decision-making. The chapter concludes that such reforms, informed by both primary and secondary sources of law, are essential for creating a more equitable and responsible business environment in South Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikovhe Maphiri, 2025. "A Critique of the Role of Social and Ethics Committees in Amplifying the Stakeholder Voice Under Company Law in South Africa: Lessons from the UK Corporate Governance Code," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance,, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-031-96205-9_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-96205-9_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-031-96205-9_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.