IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/csrchp/978-3-030-15624-4_15.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Case Study: Elaborating a Negotiated Agreement on Protected Area Concessions: Missed Opportunities for Exercising Corporate Sustainability and Responsibility in New Zealand

In: Corporate Sustainability and Responsibility in Tourism

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Dinica

    (Victoria University of Wellington)

Abstract

CSR 2.0 enlarged the area of corporate responsibility to that of policy-making. Businesses are challenged to help codesign governance and policy frameworks that are more effective at environmental protection. Such frameworks can help create the level-playing field among competitors—which businesses often invoke as necessary for them to engage in more ambitious environmental improvement targets. This case-study argues that the tourism sector in New Zealand missed an important opportunity to map and incorporate environmental performance measures and criteria into a key policy document of relevance for sustainable tourism: the 2008–2018 negotiated agreements for the allocation of tourism concession in limited-supply contexts, in Protected Areas. By applying the PARO framework (Policy Activities—Recruitment methods—Objectives), it is shown that special and generous stakeholder engagement opportunities were offered to the tourism industry representative organisation to co-design this policy instrument.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Dinica, 2019. "Case Study: Elaborating a Negotiated Agreement on Protected Area Concessions: Missed Opportunities for Exercising Corporate Sustainability and Responsibility in New Zealand," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Dagmar Lund-Durlacher & Valentina Dinica & Dirk Reiser & Matthias S. Fifka (ed.), Corporate Sustainability and Responsibility in Tourism, chapter 0, pages 253-263, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-030-15624-4_15
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-15624-4_15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-030-15624-4_15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.