IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/crechp/978-981-13-9053-1_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Post-disaster Community Recovery and Community-Based Collaborative Action Research—A Case of Process Evaluation Method for Community Life Improvement

In: Innovation Beyond Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Takayoshi Kusago

    (Kansai University)

Abstract

Innovation is not an undoubted factor to solve various social and economic hardships and lead us to a more prosperous society. In fact, the Great East Japan Earthquake occurred on 11 March 2011 and shocked both Japan and the world with its scale and seriousness of the adverse impacts on human communities and living environment. The number of natural and man-made disasters continues to rise and create hardships in different parts of the world. It does reflect growing concern over a healthy planet and well-being of people and the members of the United Nations adopted sustainable development goals (SDGs) as the overarching development goal for all in 2015. SDGs state clearly in SDG 11 that we have to find ways to realize sustainable development at cities and communities. Although SDGs become a set of common global development goals, it has never been an easy task to overcome such an adversity and find a way to restore and revitalize communities in any of the post-disaster period. The government assistance is necessary to rebuild basic infrastructure and social services for any community. However, it is not sufficient enough to provide assistance only from outside to recover and rebuild the damaged community. A critical challenge is whether a community building could be sustainable in the long run. The community’s recovery and reconstruction require local people’s voices, community’s future vision by identifying and using local assets and resources. For that end, stakeholders’ autonomous endogenous initiatives play a vital role. In this context, collaboration between stakeholders and experts is needed, and community-based collaborative action research has gradually received serious attention as a practical research method. In 2004, Chuetsu earthquake occurred and damaged communities in Niigata prefecture in Japan. In the process of a long-run recovery and revitalization of a small community in the area of the epicenter of the earthquake, a team of researchers started collaborative action research with the local residents by applying a process evaluation method for community life improvement. This chapter focuses on the issues of sustainable community development through an experiment of the process evaluation method as a community-based collaborative action research. We discuss effectiveness of community-based collaborative action research as co-creative method, which can promote public participation in scientific development and innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Takayoshi Kusago, 2019. "Post-disaster Community Recovery and Community-Based Collaborative Action Research—A Case of Process Evaluation Method for Community Life Improvement," Creative Economy, in: Sébastien Lechevalier (ed.), Innovation Beyond Technology, chapter 0, pages 195-221, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:crechp:978-981-13-9053-1_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-9053-1_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:crechp:978-981-13-9053-1_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.