IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/conchp/978-3-7908-2072-0_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Impact of the Wallis Inquiry on Australian Banking Efficiency Performance

In: Productivity, Efficiency, and Economic Growth in the Asia-Pacific Region

Author

Listed:
  • S. Wu

    (Deakin University, Burwood, Toorak, Geelong)

Abstract

Since the deregulation of the Australian financial system in early 1980s, the banking industry has undergone sweeping changes. As of December 2005, there were 53 authorised banks in Australia, including eleven foreign subsidiary banks and 29 branches of foreign banks (APRA 2005). With the entry of foreign banks and former domestic building societies into the market, domestic banks have reacted to the intensified competition by performing more efficiently and engaging more actively in mergers and acquisitions. However, the four major banks generally hold the view that the consolidation of the financial services industry and the competitiveness of the industry in the international market have been hindered by a restrictive political and regulatory environment, such as the four pillars policy prohibiting mergers among the four major banks (Guy and Whyte 2002). Therefore, it is important to analyse the performance of the Australian banking industry, with particular reference to the Wallis Inquiry into the Australian Financial System (hereafter the Inquiry) in 1996, to which the Australian Federal Government responded by adopting the four pillars policy.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Wu, 2009. "The Impact of the Wallis Inquiry on Australian Banking Efficiency Performance," Contributions to Economics, in: Jeong-Dong Lee & Almas Heshmati (ed.), Productivity, Efficiency, and Economic Growth in the Asia-Pacific Region, chapter 8, pages 173-194, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-7908-2072-0_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-2072-0_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amir Moradi-Motlagh & Ali Salman Saleh, 2014. "Re-Examining the Technical Efficiency of Australian Banks: A Bootstrap DEA Approach," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1-2), pages 112-128, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-7908-2072-0_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.