Author
Listed:
- Markus Schmidtchen
(KfW Bankengruppe)
Abstract
The credit derivatives market has enjoyed a strong growth in liquidity for loan products and credit derivatives for some years now. A growing number of players populate both the supply and demand sides of the market, leading to product diversification on the one hand and a broadening of demand on the other. Rapid growth has been observed, in particular, in the single name credit default swap market, through which institutions can hedge against credit default by large, well-known enterprises. However, the instrument that can be used to hedge against credit default by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is portfolio securitisation, through which loans or loan default risk are transferred as a package. One of the reasons for making a bundled transfer is the limited exposure to individual SMEs. However, the instrument that can be used to hedge against credit default by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is portfolio securitisation, through which loans or loan default risk are transferred as a package. One of the reasons for making a bundled transfer is the limited exposure to individual SMEs. In parallel with the development in the capital markets, many credit institutions are re-organising their credit risk management units. This is being driven, on the one hand, by the regulatory demands in credit risk measurement under Basel II. On the other hand, greater capital market liquidity is making loan products more mobile. Banks are conducting increasingly active credit portfolio management. For example, the capital market may be used to deliberately increase credit exposure by means of an investment or to deliberately reduce risk by loan securitisation. This enables a bank to optimise its credit portfolio, which in turn has a positive impact on its profits position.
Suggested Citation
Markus Schmidtchen, 2009.
"Asset Securitisation as a Profits Management Instrument,"
Contributions to Economics, in: Georg Bol & Svetlozar T. Rachev & Reinhold Würth (ed.), Risk Assessment, pages 205-213,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-7908-2050-8_9
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-2050-8_9
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-7908-2050-8_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.