IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/conchp/978-3-7908-1746-1_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Quadratic Method for Evaluating the New Hungarian Act on Electronic Communications with Respect to the Policy and Regulatory Objectives

In: Governance of Communication Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Gyula Sallai

    (Budapest University of Technology and Economics)

Abstract

Hungary transposed the new EU regulatory framework package on electronic communications in 2003. It was approved by the Hungarian Parliament in November 2003, entered into force on 1 January 2004 (except a few paragraphs). The new EU directives created an integrated regulatory system for the telecommunications, broadcasting and cable tv-distribution by introducing new terminology built on the collective term electronic communications but not including postal services. Thus, the former Act on Communications, more or less complied with the regulatory framework of 1998, was replaced by two new Acts: the Act on Electronic Communications (Eht) and the Act on the Postal Services. In the course of expressing opinion on the draft bill and the final text of Eht we have not only evaluated it article by article (this was done by a wide circle of commenting operators and state administration bodies) but we also examined the prospected fulfilment of electronic communications policy and regulatory objectives. We took the objectives in the general framework directive (Article 8) for basis and completed them for handling national particularities. In this way a wellbalanced set of 20 objectives arranged into four groups has been identified. A two-dimensional evaluation method has been elaborated (basic idea derives from the Gartner’s Magic Quadrant method used for the evaluation of companies on a defined market) that systematically analysis and scores the suitability and the feasibility of the legal solutions applied to the objectives by points ranging between 1 and 10. The evaluation is carried out by experts for each objective using the scoring criteria defined for both suitability and feasibility aspects. The pairs of scores for the objectives are represented on a 10 by 10 square. The square is divided into harmonic, pragmatic, theoretic and partial quadrants depending on the high or low scoring of the suitability and feasibility. In addition, the domains of the five quality grades of the solutions are also determined. Various mean, deviation, and correlation statistics are calculated, so that a quantitative evaluation and well-based conclusions can be drawn. The procedure, referred to as quadratic evaluation method, can be generally used for evaluating legal, policy or strategic documents, where the clarity and completeness of the concept (suitability) and the abilities to the implementation of the concept (feasibility) are equally important. Here we apply it for the evaluation of the Eht with respect to the 20 policy objectives and the legal and regulatory tools provided for the national regulatory authority in Hungary (NHH). The paper presents the policy and regulatory objectives identified, the quadratic evaluation method used and the results of scoring for the public draft and the final version of Eht.

Suggested Citation

  • Gyula Sallai, 2006. "A Quadratic Method for Evaluating the New Hungarian Act on Electronic Communications with Respect to the Policy and Regulatory Objectives," Contributions to Economics, in: Brigitte Preissl & Jürgen Müller (ed.), Governance of Communication Networks, pages 37-56, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-7908-1746-1_3
    DOI: 10.1007/3-7908-1746-5_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-7908-1746-1_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.