IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/conchp/978-3-319-15708-5_16.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Management of Ecological Compensation Measures

In: Integrated Spatial and Transport Infrastructure Development

Author

Listed:
  • Claus Peinemann

    (Verband Region Rhein-Neckar)

Abstract

CODE24—Corridor Development Rotterdam–Genoa, a project approved under the Strategic Initiatives Framework of the INTERREG IVB program, indicates a future development of the major European north-south axis connecting the Dutch port of Rotterdam and the Italian port of Genoa. Fifty percent of the north-south rail freight is operated along this corridor where 70 million inhabitants are living in this highly populated catchment area. Within the overall project CODE24, one action is focusing on innovative methods and solutions to reduce the negative impact of the corridor’s development on the environment. In a European project context, a comparison has been done of planning methods and policies concerning environmental compensation management caused by building and infrastructure projects. Partners from the Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland and Italy were involved in the evaluation of different policies. The main aim of this action is to show how development and infrastructure projects along the corridor could be harmonised with national and European regulations related to nature and environmental protection. The strong linkage between possible impact and compensation measures needs to be more adequately managed in the future. Although legal preconditions for pooling and stocking of real estate and other compensation measures for major infrastructure projects were accomplished, their realisation and the implementation of impact regulations are often ineffective in respect of sustainability. As a result of questionnaires and interviews for new, innovative and successful approaches for managing ecological compensation measures, the main objective remains to encounter the problem of finding suitable sites for compensation measures. The diversity of existing regulations concerning ecological compensation has been found to be extremely high. Some partner countries currently discuss or even prepare common regulations for ecological compensation. This adoption of a legal framework can be seen as a positive development in nature conservation policy to enhance a wider acceptance and transparency for implementation. A large-scale impact, such as a linear infrastructure development, requires a large-scale compensation. Stakeholders on a regional level should use the opportunity for necessary large-scale nature conservation projects and compensation pool-building. Coherent compensation pool-building, managed within an overall planning concept, will bring forward strategies for coherent sites and effective and sustainable measures that will show visible effects and real habitat improvements.

Suggested Citation

  • Claus Peinemann, 2016. "Management of Ecological Compensation Measures," Contributions to Economics, in: Hansjörg Drewello & Bernd Scholl (ed.), Integrated Spatial and Transport Infrastructure Development, pages 273-287, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-319-15708-5_16
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-15708-5_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sponagel, Christian & Angenendt, Elisabeth & Piepho, Hans-Peter & Bahrs, Enno, 2021. "Farmers’ preferences for nature conservation compensation measures with a focus on eco-accounts according to the German Nature Conservation Act," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:conchp:978-3-319-15708-5_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.