IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/comchp/978-3-032-06385-4_4.html

Hydrological Balance Assessment for Sustainable Water Resources Management: Case Studies in Ghana, Burkina Faso, Kenya, and Tanzania

In: Biodiversity in Agri-Food Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Konstadinos Mattas

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Agricultural Economics)

  • Pantazis Georgiou

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Hydraulics, Soil Science and Agricultural Engineering, School of Agriculture)

  • Christos Mattas

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Structural, Historical and Applied Geology, School of Geology)

  • Dimitra Lazaridou

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Agricultural Economics
    Agricultural University of Athens, Department of Forestry and Natural Environment Management)

  • Stefanos Nastis

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Agricultural Economics)

  • Seddaiu Giovanna

    (University of Sassari, Department of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Mamadou Traore

    (University Nazi BONI)

  • Kombiok James Mantent

    (Kundok Development Consult (KDC))

  • Sheila Okoth

    (University of Nairobi, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology)

  • Deodatus Kiriba

    (Tanzania Agricultural Research Institute (TARI)-Selian Centre)

Abstract

Effective water resources management is crucial for addressing challenges such as climate change, population growth, and increasing agricultural demands. Within the EWA-BELT project framework, the Thornthwaite-Mather method was employed to evaluate the water balance across selected watersheds in Ghana, Tanzania, Burkina Faso, and Kenya. This well-established method provides insight into the dynamic interactions among precipitation, evapotranspiration, and soil water storage over time within a specified geographic area. Comprehensive data—including land use, soil characteristics, geological conditions, GIS information (sourced from literature reviews and online platforms), and meteorological records (precipitation and temperature)—were integrated to calculate the water balance. The analysis highlighted distinct hydrological differences between East and West Africa. East African sites generally experience lower temperatures, higher precipitation, and more permeable geological formations. Key findings indicate that all studied basins exhibit a water surplus, with annual soil moisture reaching capacity, thereby storing excess water in aquifers and contributing to runoff. Notably, case studies in Kenya and Tanzania demonstrate a higher potential for water resource exploitation due to increased precipitation, higher infiltration rates, and relatively lower evapotranspiration compared to Ghana and Burkina Faso. Consequently, these regions may provide more water to meet human demands, particularly for irrigation. The method’s outputs offer valuable insights for water resource management, agricultural planning, and climate change impact assessments, particularly in regions where water availability is critically dependent on seasonal and inter-annual variations.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstadinos Mattas & Pantazis Georgiou & Christos Mattas & Dimitra Lazaridou & Stefanos Nastis & Seddaiu Giovanna & Mamadou Traore & Kombiok James Mantent & Sheila Okoth & Deodatus Kiriba, 2025. "Hydrological Balance Assessment for Sustainable Water Resources Management: Case Studies in Ghana, Burkina Faso, Kenya, and Tanzania," Cooperative Management, in: Konstadinos Mattas & George Baourakis & Constantin Zopounidis & Christos Staboulis (ed.), Biodiversity in Agri-Food Systems, chapter 0, pages 55-82, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:comchp:978-3-032-06385-4_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-06385-4_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comchp:978-3-032-06385-4_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.