IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/comchp/978-3-030-38766-2_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection: An Updated Literature Review

In: Operational Research in Agriculture and Tourism

Author

Listed:
  • Syrine Jemaa

    (Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (CIHEAM-MAICh))

  • Ahmed Alayidi

    (Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (CIHEAM-MAICh))

  • Athanasios Migdalas

    (Luleå University of Technology)

  • George Baourakis

    (Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (CIHEAM-MAICh))

  • Periklis Drakos

    (University of Crete)

Abstract

Green supply chain management is concerned with the integration of environmental criteria and sustainability issues in the management of the supply chain. Within this framework, firms applying internally green strategy have, naturally, the interest to pressure purchases of goods and services from suppliers that are themselves green, at least to a certain extent. Thus, Supplier Evaluation and Selection is crucial due to its big impact on business function. The prospect of applying green principles has consequently become an important feature of a supplier’s overall performance. Hence, green supplier selection and evaluation, although a relatively new research subject, has grown quite rapidly. It develops and studies the decision and evaluation models based on environmental criteria. Its main tools are based on multi-criteria decision making approaches. Our objective, in this paper, is to review journal articles published in the period 2012–2019 on this topic, in order to identify the most widely applied approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection and the most cited green criteria. Our research methodology in inducing the present review has been based on several criteria for the selection of the appropriate articles relevant to the subject. The analysis of those papers has led to an extended classification with respect to the multi-criteria decision making approaches, as well as with respect to the adopted green criteria. We conclude that the majority of applied approaches are based on integrated fuzzy models and that the most popular criteria are “Environmental management system” and “Green design”.

Suggested Citation

  • Syrine Jemaa & Ahmed Alayidi & Athanasios Migdalas & George Baourakis & Periklis Drakos, 2020. "Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection: An Updated Literature Review," Cooperative Management, in: Evangelia Krassadaki & George Baourakis & Constantin Zopounidis & Nikolaos Matsatsinis (ed.), Operational Research in Agriculture and Tourism, pages 169-196, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:comchp:978-3-030-38766-2_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-38766-2_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shouzhen Zeng & Yingjie Hu & Tomas Balezentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2020. "A multi‐criteria sustainable supplier selection framework based on neutrosophic fuzzy data and entropy weighting," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1431-1440, September.
    2. Imane Tronnebati & Manal El Yadari & Fouad Jawab, 2022. "A Review of Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection Issues Using MCDM, MP and AI Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Mehdi Keshavarz-Ghorabaee & Maghsoud Amiri & Mohammad Hashemi-Tabatabaei & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Arturas Kaklauskas, 2020. "A New Decision-Making Approach Based on Fermatean Fuzzy Sets and WASPAS for Green Construction Supplier Evaluation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comchp:978-3-030-38766-2_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.