IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/circec/v1y2021i4d10.1007_s43615-021-00039-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Perceptions on the Constraints to Agroforestry Competitiveness: A Case Study of Agrosilviculture Community Growers in Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • P. Maponya

    (Agricultural Research Council-Vegetable and Ornamental Plant)

  • I. C. Madakadze

    (University of Pretoria)

  • N. Mbili

    (University of KwaZulu-Natal)

  • Z. P. Dube

    (University of Mpumalanga)

  • T. Nkuna

    (Agricultural Research Council-Vegetable and Ornamental Plant)

  • M. Makhwedzhana

    (Agricultural Research Council-Vegetable and Ornamental Plant)

  • T. Tahulela

    (South African Forestry Company Limited (SAFCOL) Research, SAFCOL (Pty) LTD)

  • K. Mongwaketsi

    (South African Forestry Company Limited (SAFCOL) Research, SAFCOL (Pty) LTD)

  • L. Isaacs

    (Mountain to Ocean (MTO) Forestry)

Abstract

Agroforestry is a land-use system that includes the use of woody perennial, agricultural crops, and animals in combination to achieve beneficial ecological and economical interactions for food, fiber, and livestock production. However, limited understanding, incorrect information, and a negative mindset could hinder the competitiveness of this practice. This case study of agrosilviculture community growers attempts to explain the grower’s constraints to agroforestry competitiveness by analyzing their agroforestry perception. Hence, the study was aimed to document grower’s perception on the constraints to agroforestry competitiveness in Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces. Quantitative and qualitative designs were used as a questionnaire written in English, and stakeholder’s discussion and field observations were part of the data collection. A purposive sampling technique was used to select 182 agrosilviculture community growers from 30 villages. Data was coded, captured, and analyzed using SPSS. The results indicated that the production factors, demand conditions, related and supporting industries, government support, chance, and quite a few community growers indicated that the market was causing a decrease in agroforestry competitiveness as the majority of growers strongly agreed and agreed respectively. The results further indicated that firm strategy, structure, and rivalry were not causing a decrease in agroforestry competitiveness as the majority of growers strongly disagreed and disagreed. In conclusion, identified community growers’ perceptions are in line with some of the researcher’s field observations, and it is thus recommended that stakeholders should take note of the constraints identified by the agrosilviculture community growers in an attempt to increase agroforestry competitiveness in South Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Maponya & I. C. Madakadze & N. Mbili & Z. P. Dube & T. Nkuna & M. Makhwedzhana & T. Tahulela & K. Mongwaketsi & L. Isaacs, 2021. "Perceptions on the Constraints to Agroforestry Competitiveness: A Case Study of Agrosilviculture Community Growers in Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces, South Africa," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:1:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s43615-021-00039-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s43615-021-00039-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43615-021-00039-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43615-021-00039-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:1:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s43615-021-00039-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.