IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6463-898-1_10.html

Can ChatGPT Satisfy All? An Experimental Evidence

In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Management for Business and Industrial Growth (AIMBIG 2025)

Author

Listed:
  • Preeti Sharma

    (University of Engineering and Management)

  • Sourav Banerjee

    (University of Engineering and Management)

  • Anupam Bhattacharya

    (Institute of Engineering and Management)

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is still in its nascent stage. With rapid advancements in terms of technology and use, researchers hold diverse views about its ability to complement natural intelligence. Out of several apprehensions regarding its adaptability, the aspect of self-satisfaction is yet to be empirically studied. In this paper, we demonstrate a set of experiments on two groups of postgraduate students. Each group contained students with and without expertise on ChatGPT. Each student in both the groups are given tasks to develop two technical reports: with and without using generative AI tools respectively. The first report was generic in nature, whereas the second report was more domain-oriented requiring deeper understanding and complex search. The outputs are measured on three aspects: report generation time, self-satisfaction and search utility. Students with AI expertise took significantly more time for domain-specific topic under ChatGPT. Ownership and associated pride were significantly higher in self-generated reports. For experts, AI-generated reports for generic topic showed more enrichment. Ownership and pride is found to be higher in AI-generated domain-reports when compared with that of AI-generated generic reports amongst the expert group. The second group is controlled over incentivised mechanism, and they also underwent a short AI training program. The incentivised group demonstrated significantly higher ownership, pride and enrichment along with marginally lesser standard deviation across all variables. Positive correlation is observed between search time and satisfaction amongst the expert group. Based on the final result, a theoretical framework of ‘Natural-Artificial Indifference-curve’ is proposed for further experiment.

Suggested Citation

  • Preeti Sharma & Sourav Banerjee & Anupam Bhattacharya, 2025. "Can ChatGPT Satisfy All? An Experimental Evidence," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, in: Preeti Sharma & Sweta Pareek & Sourav Banerjee (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Management for Business and Industrial Growth (AIMBIG 2025), pages 122-131, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-898-1_10
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-898-1_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-898-1_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.