IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6463-835-6_79.html

Design and Empirical Evaluation of a Sustainability KPI Framework for Corporate R&D Laboratories

In: Proceedings of the 2025 3rd International Academic Conference on Management Innovation and Economic Development (MIED 2025)

Author

Listed:
  • Yiqun Ma

    (State Grid Energy Research Institute CO., LTD (SGERI.))

  • Qiang Sun

    (State Grid Energy Research Institute CO., LTD (SGERI.))

Abstract

Corporate R&D laboratories are under increasing pressure to comply with ESG standards, yet often lack structured tools for assessing sustainability performance. This study develops a multidimensional KPI framework addressing resource efficiency, environmental impact, compliance, and organizational engagement. Twelve indicators were identified through literature review and expert consultation. A hybrid weighting approach, integrating Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and entropy methods, was employed to ensure balanced evaluation. Applied in a corporate laboratory, the framework demonstrated operational feasibility, strategic relevance, and diagnostic value. While technical metrics performed well, cultural indicators lagged, highlighting the need for behavioural incentives. Stakeholder feedback supported the dashboard’s utility for management and communication purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiqun Ma & Qiang Sun, 2025. "Design and Empirical Evaluation of a Sustainability KPI Framework for Corporate R&D Laboratories," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, in: Barbara Siuta-Tokarska & Adriana Grigorescu & Md. Mamun Habib & Yifeng Zhu (ed.), Proceedings of the 2025 3rd International Academic Conference on Management Innovation and Economic Development (MIED 2025), pages 739-747, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-835-6_79
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-835-6_79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-835-6_79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.