IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6463-724-3_15.html

An Analysis of the Social Influence of Chinese Red Books in an Open Science Environment: A Case Study of the Recommended Books of two First-class Universities in East China

In: Proceedings of the 2025 5th International Conference on Informatization Economic Development and Management (IEDM 2025)

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaolu Xia

    (Nanjing University of Technology, School of Economics and Management)

  • Jieqin Jin

    (Nanjing University of Technology, School of Economics and Management)

  • Fang Zhang

    (Nanjing University of Technology, School of Economics and Management)

Abstract

The open science environment promotes the dissemination of red books, and the evaluation of the social influence of red books is of great significance. This study explores 23 indicators based on Chinese network media platforms and explores a set of evaluation system suitable for the social influence of Chinese red books. This paper uses CRITIC method and TOPSIS method to study the social influence of 155 red books recommended by two first-class universities in East China. The results show that the evaluation index system of social influence of red books proposed in this paper has certain extensibility, and the multi-dimensional publicity of red books and the construction of data integration platform of social influence of books should be strengthened in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaolu Xia & Jieqin Jin & Fang Zhang, 2025. "An Analysis of the Social Influence of Chinese Red Books in an Open Science Environment: A Case Study of the Recommended Books of two First-class Universities in East China," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, in: Meilin Zhang & Au Yong Hui Nee & Khurram Shehzad & Sameer Kumar & Ehsan Javanmardi (ed.), Proceedings of the 2025 5th International Conference on Informatization Economic Development and Management (IEDM 2025), pages 151-158, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-724-3_15
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-724-3_15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-724-3_15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.