IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6463-692-5_18.html

Understanding Consumption Choice: Closing the Gap from Intention to Purchase Decision of Eco-Friendly Packaging Product

In: Proceedings of the 12th Gadjah Mada International Conference on Economics and Business (GAMAICEB 2024)

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Harliyono

    (Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Faculty of Psychology)

  • Hana Panggabean

    (Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Faculty of Psychology)

  • Rustono Farady Marta

    (Universitas Satya Negara Indonesia, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences)

Abstract

According to the United Nations Environment Programme, Indonesia is the second-largest plastic polluter in the world after China. An estimated 3.2 million tons of unmanaged plastic waste are produced in Indonesia annually; of these, 1.29 million tons end up in the sea, and 85,000 tons, or 10 billion plastic carry bags, are released into the local ecosystem. Another study written in The Jakarta Post in 2020 also mentioned that Ciliwung is among the world’s most polluted rivers. The study was conducted by a group of Indonesian scientists and Dutch researchers, who also found that the weight of plastic waste from all rivers in Jakarta totals 2.1 million kilograms. Therefore, this paper is conducted to find ways to contribute to reducing plastic waste packaging by understanding how consumers in Jakarta make their consumption choices. The focus of this study is to explore traits to understand the purchase decision of products with eco-friendly packaging. Hence creating a pro-environmental behavior by closing the gap between green purchase intention into decision. The combined application of market research and behavior theory of psychology discipline help develop a more in-depth understanding of consumers’ purchase decisions. As well as differentiation in product value perception between the research participant’s group. Data will be collected by conducting qualitative research. Four sessions of focus group discussion (FGD) of 20 participants consisting of 10 males and 10 females which divided into 2 groups: with income by work (self-earning money) and depending on expenditure to parents. There are differences spotted between male and female consumers in the process of making purchase decisions. Males have the tendency to be more practical, whereas female has more aspects of consideration. In the groups differentiated based on earnings, it is also found that pricing and product availability play an important role in purchase decisions. To be able to push pro-environment behavior and better purchase decisions, there are five important factors that need to be considered: person-related, product-related, environmental-related, reference group-related, and values.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Harliyono & Hana Panggabean & Rustono Farady Marta, 2025. "Understanding Consumption Choice: Closing the Gap from Intention to Purchase Decision of Eco-Friendly Packaging Product," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, in: Widya Paramita & Muhammad Ryan Sanjaya & Nurul Indarti & Fu'ad Rakhman & Leo Indra Wardhana (ed.), Proceedings of the 12th Gadjah Mada International Conference on Economics and Business (GAMAICEB 2024), pages 333-357, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-692-5_18
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-692-5_18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-692-5_18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.