IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6463-690-1_9.html

An Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government, Manufacturing Companies, and Consumers in ESG Strategy Selection

In: Proceedings of the 2024 6th International Conference on Economic Management and Model Engineering (ICEMME 2024)

Author

Listed:
  • Wei He

    (Three Gorges Electric Power Co., Ltd.)

  • Xiao Wang

    (Three Gorges Electric Power Co., Ltd.)

  • Yu Ruan

    (Three Gorges Electric Power Co., Ltd.)

  • Hongwei Dong

    (Three Gorges Electric Power Co., Ltd.)

  • Yixun Lei

    (Three Gorges Electric Power Co., Ltd.)

  • Zhijing Wang

    (Three Gorges Electric Power Co., Ltd.)

  • Hongwei Yu

    (Wuhan University, Institute of Quality Development Strategy)

  • Li Zhu

    (Wuhan University, Electronic Information School)

Abstract

As global environmental issues and awareness of social responsibility continue to grow, the importance of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) strategies in manufacturing is increasingly emphasized. These strategies are becoming a key factor in sustainable business development and guide the industry towards a more eco-friendly, equitable, and efficient direction. This research provides critical insights for policymakers, manufacturing companies, and consumers by constructing a triadic dynamic evolutionary game model to explore the mechanisms influencing the government, manufacturing companies, and consumers in choosing ESG strategies. The model assumes that the government, companies, and consumers are bounded rationality actors, adjusting their strategies through the game to achieve optimal outcomes. The analysis considers the initial income, cost inputs, returns, and other related factors for the government, companies, and consumers. The study reveals that multiple factors influence the government, manufacturing companies, and consumers in their choice of ESG strategies. If the government’s governance costs are too high, it may not implement environmental regulation, and manufacturing companies may not adopt ESG strategies. When environmental protection taxes increase, the government is more inclined to strengthen regulation, and companies are more likely to choose ESG strategies. Moreover, consumers’ increased preference for ESG products can raise the opportunity cost of not adopting ESG strategies, further driving the government’s and companies’ decisions to choose ESG strategies. The research highlights the critical role of balancing costs and benefits in choosing ESG strategies, providing theoretical guidance for manufacturing companies and governments in environmental governance and ESG strategy choices. Furthermore, it offers a practical framework for companies to enhance their competitiveness and operational efficiency by aligning with evolving regulatory standards and consumer preferences, ultimately contributing to sustainable development and long-term profitability.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei He & Xiao Wang & Yu Ruan & Hongwei Dong & Yixun Lei & Zhijing Wang & Hongwei Yu & Li Zhu, 2025. "An Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government, Manufacturing Companies, and Consumers in ESG Strategy Selection," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, in: Lina Zhong & Tang Yao & Chee Yoong Liew & Hongbo Li (ed.), Proceedings of the 2024 6th International Conference on Economic Management and Model Engineering (ICEMME 2024), pages 70-96, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-690-1_9
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-690-1_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-690-1_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.