IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6463-652-9_27.html

A Comparative Study of Financing in China and the US Based on ESG Concepts

In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Navigating the Digital Business Frontier for Sustainable Financial Innovation (ICDEBA 2024)

Author

Listed:
  • Shaoyuan Xia

    (Capital University of Economics and Business, School of Finance)

Abstract

This paper, guided by the concept of ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance), presents a comparative analysis of the current financing landscape in China and the United States. By selecting representative companies for case studies, the research explores the differences in financing models, including variations in financing entities, capital flows, and development factors. The analysis highlights the divergent characteristics and influences of these factors on ESG financing in both countries. Through the comparison of ESG financing practices between China and the U.S., the study provides insights and valuable lessons for the development of China’s ESG financing market. The findings aim to contribute to a deeper understanding of how different financing approaches can support sustainable development and corporate governance improvements, while offering recommendations for policymakers and industry leaders in China to enhance the growth and effectiveness of ESG-focused financial markets. This research serves as a reference point for fostering innovation in ESG financing models and advancing the sustainable finance agenda in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaoyuan Xia, 2025. "A Comparative Study of Financing in China and the US Based on ESG Concepts," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, in: Junfeng Lu (ed.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Navigating the Digital Business Frontier for Sustainable Financial Innovation (ICDEBA 2024), pages 262-270, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-652-9_27
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-652-9_27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-652-9_27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.