IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6463-598-0_51.html

Exploration of Safety Culture Construction and Management in Rail Transit Enterprises

In: Proceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Public Service, Economic Management and Sustainable Development (PESD 2024)

Author

Listed:
  • Qianqian Li

    (Beijing MTR Construction Administration Corporation
    Beijing Key Laboratory of Fully Automatic Operation and Safety Monitoring for Urban Rail Transit)

  • Xin Bai

    (Beijing Academy of Science and Technology)

  • Youqiang Liu

    (Beijing Academy of Emergency Management Science and Technology)

  • Xuehua Fan

    (Beijing Haidian District Emergency Management Bureau)

  • Ziyang Lyu

    (Beijing Academy of Science and Technology)

Abstract

In order to enhance the level of safety culture construction and management capabilities of rail transit enterprises, this article analyzes the safety culture of enterprises, determines four main primary indicators and sixteen secondary indicators for evaluating enterprise safety culture, and uses the Analytic Hierarchy Process to establish an evaluation model to calculate the weights of each factor. Research shows that safety behavior culture has the greatest impact on the development of safety culture in rail transit enterprises (weight 0.4309), while safety concept culture has the smallest impact (weight 0.0963); In the secondary indicators, the impact of all staff safety incentives (weight 0.4661), safety technology standardization (weight 0.4173), and safety management behavior standardization (weight 0.2576) is the most significant, while the impact of enterprise platform safety publicity is the smallest (weight 0.0909). Therefore, in the process of building a corporate safety culture, it is necessary to attach importance to motivating and managing employees’ safety behaviors, as well as strengthening the standardization of safety technology. In addition, in order to further quantify the evaluation of the enterprise safety culture system, the K-medoids algorithm was used to avoid noisy data, combined with the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Evaluation, to evaluate the safety culture construction level of Beijing Rail Transit Construction Co., Ltd. The evaluation results were basically consistent with the actual situation, verifying the effectiveness of the model and providing reference for the safety culture construction of other enterprises in the same industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Qianqian Li & Xin Bai & Youqiang Liu & Xuehua Fan & Ziyang Lyu, 2024. "Exploration of Safety Culture Construction and Management in Rail Transit Enterprises," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, in: Qiujing Wu & Songsong Liu & Guoliang Wang & Jia Li (ed.), Proceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Public Service, Economic Management and Sustainable Development (PESD 2024), pages 493-501, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-598-0_51
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-598-0_51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-598-0_51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.