IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6463-506-5_62.html

A Review and Perspective of Research on the Inconsistency of Online Reviews on New Products Adoption Intentions

In: Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Enterprise Management and Economic Development (ICEMED 2024)

Author

Listed:
  • Yizhao Liu

    (Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, School of Business Administration)

Abstract

The launch and market acceptance of new products is important for companies to innovate and gain competitive advantage, but the reality is that the launch and marketing of new products is always accompanied by a high rate of failure and risk. Now that consumers rely heavily on the internet and social media for information, reviews are critical, but inconsistencies in reviews are becoming more prominent, especially for new products that consumers are unfamiliar with. So how should companies and marketers respond? In response, this review article explores the impact of online review inconsistency on new product adoption intentions and suggests directions for future research. The article begins with an overview of the phenomenon of online review inconsistency and its impact on consumers and firms. Through the literature review, we find that different scholars hold different views on the impact of online review inconsistency, which highlights the need for in-depth research on the phenomenon. In this paper, we further sort out the definition and manipulation methods of online review inconsistency and analyze its limitations. Based on the theoretical perspectives of optimal arousal theory, perceived usefulness, and risk-related theory, the article explores the mechanisms by which prior review inconsistency affects consumers' willingness to adopt new products. In addition, the article discusses the role of moderators such as product type, review itself factors and socio-cultural. Finally, in theoretical significance, this review combs through existing theories and proposes possible future research directions, such as consumer attitude ambivalence and social value perspectives. In the practical sense, the article provides insights into how firms can manage and leverage online review inconsistency to make valuable and consumer-preferred innovations that engage consumers and contribute to the market success of new products. Through these studies, we can better understand the impact of online review inconsistency on consumer behavior, bringing value to both businesses and consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Yizhao Liu, 2024. "A Review and Perspective of Research on the Inconsistency of Online Reviews on New Products Adoption Intentions," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, in: Hongbing Cheng & Sikandar Ali Qalati & Noor Sharoja Binti Sapiei & Mazni Binti Abdullah (ed.), Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Enterprise Management and Economic Development (ICEMED 2024), pages 558-564, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-506-5_62
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-506-5_62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-506-5_62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.