Author
Listed:
- Wang Xu
(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library)
- Liu Hui
(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library)
- Zhang Ying
(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library)
- Ren Huiling
(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library)
- Wang Junhui
(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library)
Abstract
[Purpose] This paper analyzes the development status of research on magnum opus recognition theory and methods in academic papers, and clarifies the future development direction of related research, which is aim at providing reference for subsequent research on the method system of magnus recognition. [Methods] This paper mainly uses the literature research method, subject analysis and content analysis method to carry out the whole research. The LDA topic model written based on python used as input to collect bibliographic data for topic clustering. According to the results of topic clustering, sort out the relevant theoretical system and method application, analyze the major and difficult problems in the process, and clarify research status and development trend of the theory and method of the recognition of academic papers masterpieces. [Conclusion and Prospect]Representative recognition is developing in the direction of intelligence, compound and network, however, the research on the theory and method of academic papers masterpieces is still not complete. There are still some problems in the recognition of masterpieces, such as the objects identification individual particularity, the disciplines and the research directions heterogeneity, the inflexibility of the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, and the applicability of the masterpieces to authors of different levels. How to fully comprehend the semantic context information in the massive academic achievements and set up reasonable quantitative indicators of recognition is the future direction of representative recognition efforts we should make.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-498-3_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.