IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6463-244-6_31.html

Virtual vs. Physical Office: Which One Increases Productivity the Most?

In: Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2023)

Author

Listed:
  • Iffa Nurlatifah

    (Multimedia University)

  • Juliani Dyah Trisnawati

    (University of Surabaya)

  • Muhammad Rosiawan

    (University of Surabaya)

Abstract

This study aims to compare the effects of virtual and physical office environments on employee productivity by conducting qualitative interviews with employees in both types of work environments. The interviews will find out how the employee feels about their work environment, how they work, and how productive they are overall. A qualitative method, such as thematic analysis, was used to look at the collected data to find patterns and themes about how the office environment affects productivity. The results of this study will give us a better idea of how employees feel in both offices and help us decide how to design and run offices in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Iffa Nurlatifah & Juliani Dyah Trisnawati & Muhammad Rosiawan, 2024. "Virtual vs. Physical Office: Which One Increases Productivity the Most?," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, in: Werner Ria Murhadi & Dudi Anandya & Noviaty Kresna Darmasetiawan & Juliani Dyah Trisnawati & Putu An (ed.), Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2023), pages 194-198, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-244-6_31
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-244-6_31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-244-6_31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.