IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6463-194-4_13.html

Research Review on Seismic Test of Cross-Fault Pipeline

In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of Risk Analysis Council of China Association for Disaster Prevention (RAC 2022)

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoqing Fan

    (China Earthquake Administration, Institute of Geophysics)

  • Aiwen Liu

    (China Earthquake Administration, Institute of Geophysics)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Urban water supply and drainage pipelines, oil and gas pipelines and other buried pipelines are lifeline projects related to the national economy and people's livelihood, so their seismic performance has been concerned by scholars at home and abroad. The experience and lessons of earthquake damage at home and abroad show that the dislocation of seismic fault is one of the main causes of pipeline damage. This paper summarizes the research progress of seismic test of cross fault pipeline at home and abroad in recent 20 years. According to the pipe size used in the test, it can be divided into scale test and in-situ full-scale test; the test methods can be divided into three test methods: pseudo-static test, shaking table test and centrifuge test. In this paper, these test methods are analyzed in detail, and the advantages and disadvantages of various methods are compared, which provides a reference for the development of seismic test of buried pipeline in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoqing Fan & Aiwen Liu, 2023. "Research Review on Seismic Test of Cross-Fault Pipeline," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, in: Sen Qiao & Hongbin Cao & Aiwen Liu & Xueliang Chen & Tiefei Li (ed.), Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of Risk Analysis Council of China Association for Disaster Prevention (RAC 2022), pages 84-92, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-194-4_13
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-194-4_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-194-4_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.