IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6463-176-0_13.html

Comparative Analysis of Islamic Mutual Fund Performance in Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, and Indonesia in 2018–2020

In: 4th International Conference on Islamic Economics, Business, Philanthropy, and PhD Colloquium (ICIEBP) 2022

Author

Listed:
  • Suci Aprilliani Utami

    (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Islamic Economics and Finance Department, Faculty of Economics and Business Education)

  • Adelia Puspa

    (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Islamic Economics and Finance Department, Faculty of Economics and Business Education)

  • Rida Rosida

    (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Islamic Economics and Finance Department, Faculty of Economics and Business Education)

Abstract

Islamic mutual funds are one of the most popular types of investment instruments in the Islamic capital market today. Islamic mutual funds have a market share of 5% or equivalent to USD 178 billion with a total of 1.698 institutions. Saudi Arabia is in the first position with a total Islamic mutual fund assets of USD 53 billion. Malaysia is in the third position with a total Islamic mutual fund assets of USD 38 billion. Meanwhile, Indonesia is in the sixth position with total Islamic mutual fund assets of USD 3 billion. The purpose of this study was to compare performance of Islamic mutual funds in Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, and Indonesia in 2018–2020. The method used in this research was comparative descriptive method with quantitative approach. This study used the purposive sampling technique with a total sample of 69 Islamic mutual fund products, including 15 money market Islamic mutual fund products, 15 fixed income Islamic mutual fund products, 21 Islamic stock mutual fund products, and 18 mixed Islamic mutual fund products. In addition, the performance of Islamic mutual funds was measured using the Sharpe ratio model. The results of the study showed that the Islamic money market and fixed income mutual funds in Indonesia were superior to those of Malaysia and Saudi Arabia. Those of meanwhile, share and mixed Islamic mutual funds in Saudi Arabia were superior to Indonesia and Malaysia. Thus the performance of the Islamic mutual funds may serve one of the considerations aspects to consider by investors in select the type of Islamic mutual funds taking into consideration the economic conditions of a country. In addition, investors can choose Islamic mutual fund products managed by investment managers based on the levels of return and risk the product have.

Suggested Citation

  • Suci Aprilliani Utami & Adelia Puspa & Rida Rosida, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Islamic Mutual Fund Performance in Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, and Indonesia in 2018–2020," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, in: Meri Indri Hapsari & M. Bastomi Fahri Zusak (ed.), 4th International Conference on Islamic Economics, Business, Philanthropy, and PhD Colloquium (ICIEBP) 2022, pages 192-206, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-176-0_13
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-176-0_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-176-0_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.