IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6463-140-1_59.html

Physical Quality of Ultrasonicated Liquid Smoke as the Goat Meat Coating

In: Proceedings of the 2022 Brawijaya International Conference (BIC 2022)

Author

Listed:
  • Radya Setianto Wibowo

    (Brawijaya University, Department of Animal Product Technology, Faculty of Animal Science)

  • Agus Susilo

    (Brawijaya University, Department of Animal Product Technology, Faculty of Animal Science)

  • Djalal Rosyidi

    (Brawijaya University, Department of Animal Product Technology, Faculty of Animal Science)

Abstract

Liquid smoke is an alternative material to replace conventional smoking methods. This study aims to see the physical quality of liquid smoke from wood and leaves of Kusambi and liquid smoke from coconut shells after being given ultrasonic treatment at pH, Electrical Conductivity (EC), Total Dissolved Solid (TDS), Oxidation-Reduction Potentials (ORP), Specific Gravity (SG), Colors, and Salinity. This research is a laboratory experiment using Randomized Block Design (RBD) with two types of liquid smoke and five groups of various concentrations of liquid smoke and was carried out for three repetitions. Control treatment using pure aquadest without any mixture with ultrasonic treatment. There are two types of liquid smoke solutions, Kusambi liquid smoke and coconut shell liquid smoke, each of which is grouped into five groups, namely liquid smoke solutions with concentrations of 0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, and 5%. Each sample was treated with an ultrasonic bath at room temperature for 10 min. Data were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). If the data showed a significant difference, it is continued with Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT). The average value of pH is 3.91–4.37. Liquid Smoke has acidic compounds, such as acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, and valeric acid, which can affect the pH level of each increase in concentration. The average value of EC is 60.27–237.47 S/cm, the average value of TDS is 30.73–115.73 ppm, the average value of lightness (L*) 23.35–23.50%, the average value of redness (*a) is −4.54%–−3.85%, the average value of yellowness (*b) is 3.34–4.01%, the average value of ORP is 298.07 – 317.73 mv. The SG value for all samples is 1.002, and the average salinity value is 25.73–119.80 ppm. The difference in the concentration of liquid smoke did not have a significant effect (P > 0,05) on the EC, TDS, Color, and SG tests. The difference in the concentration of liquid smoke had a very significant effect (P 0,05) on the Color L* and SG test. However, the different kinds of liquid smoke had a significant effect (P

Suggested Citation

  • Radya Setianto Wibowo & Agus Susilo & Djalal Rosyidi, 2023. "Physical Quality of Ultrasonicated Liquid Smoke as the Goat Meat Coating," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, in: Yusfan Adeputera Yusran & Femiana Gapsari Madhi Fitri & Titin Andri Wihastuti & Fajar Ari Nugroho & (ed.), Proceedings of the 2022 Brawijaya International Conference (BIC 2022), pages 595-606, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-140-1_59
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-140-1_59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-140-1_59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.