IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6463-008-4_11.html

Comparison of Optimal Portfolio Before and During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Testing on LQ45

In: Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2022)

Author

Listed:
  • Evelyn Kusuma

    (University of Surabaya)

  • Putu Anom Mahadwartha

    (University of Surabaya)

  • Endang Ernawati

    (University of Surabaya)

Abstract

This study forms an optimal portfolio using a single index model on LQ45 index stocks and compares its performance before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. Return, risk, Sharpe ratio, and Treynor ratio are compared between the period before and during the pandemic. The calculation of excess return to beta results obtains three stocks that make up the optimal portfolio (2016 to 2021), namely ANTM, BBCA, and INCO, with sequential proportions of 89.87%, 1.96%, and 8.17%. The different paired sample t-test results show differences in risk and Sharpe ratio performance in the portfolio before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. The risk is higher during than before the pandemic, with a higher Sharpe ratio value before the pandemic, even though both are negative. Meanwhile, the paired sample t-test comparison results for returns and Treynor ratio show no difference in portfolio performance before and during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Evelyn Kusuma & Putu Anom Mahadwartha & Endang Ernawati, 2023. "Comparison of Optimal Portfolio Before and During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Testing on LQ45," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, in: Werner Ria Murhadi & Dudi Anandya & Noviaty Kresna Darmasetiawan & Juliani Dyah Trisnawati & Putu An (ed.), Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2022), pages 78-84, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-008-4_11
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-008-4_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6463-008-4_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.