IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6239-711-8_7.html

Authorship (AI’s Version?)

Author

Listed:
  • Amal Benakcha

    (University of Biskra, Department of Law, faculty of law and political science, Laboratory of Rights and Freedoms in Comparative Legal Systems)

  • Chaib Mohamed Toufik

    (University of Biskra, Department of Law, faculty of Law and political Science, Laboratory of Rights and Freedoms in Comparative Legal Systems)

Abstract

This paper examines, who owns authorship rights, humans or AI? based on theoretical prospective and on legal cases studies, by reading between the legal’s lines of authorship in this digital age. The last few years, we’ve stepped into a brand-new era, which called “Artificial Intelligence” this new term that we can name “the nonhuman intelligence” has taken over mostly everywhere in our daily basic life, and to be more factual, the right term to use is “the age of hybrid creativity”, and that’s because the huge rapid capacity of AI in producing, diverse creative content, such as generate literary, artistic and even scientific works, and so many other creative works. making a global impact that scripted into our minds. This brand-new thing created a new conventional, fragmented legal issue, in international landscape in re-defining authorship, by rewriting the whole concept of it. If we look into the meaning of this one, we will find that AI challenges the foundation of original work, and copyrightability because the traditional idea of an author and human intellectual as the natural person who create it, but with AI this led to various prospectives on who should be credited.

Suggested Citation

  • Amal Benakcha & Chaib Mohamed Toufik, 2026. "Authorship (AI’s Version?)," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research,, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6239-711-8_7
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6239-711-8_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6239-711-8_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.