IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6239-711-8_4.html

Artificial Intelligence Ethics in Islamic Society: Towards an Integrative Approach between Maqasid al-Shariah and International Standards for AI Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Sofiane Fellah

    (University of Biskra)

  • Mebarka Bedarnia

    (University of Laghouat)

  • Oulfa M’ziou

    (University of Biskra)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping economic and institutional life in Muslim-majority societies, yet prevailing governance frameworks, including UNESCO’s AI Ethics Recommendation and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, remain grounded in secular normative assumptions that do not adequately engage Islamic ethical traditions. This study examines the extent to which a selective and contextualized integration of Maqasid al-Shariah, the higher objectives of Islamic law as articulated by Al-Ghazali, Al-Shatibi, Auda, and Kamali, and international AI governance standards can contribute to the ethical regulation of AI in digital entrepreneurship and Islamic finance. Adopting a qualitative comparative methodology, the study maps five Maqasid objectives against corresponding AI governance principles, identifying functional convergences, normative divergences, and governance tensions. Key findings reveal shared concerns for harm prevention, human dignity, and accountability, while highlighting fundamental divergences: Maqasid ethics is grounded in divine accountability and absolute prohibitions, notably riba and gharar, whereas international standards rely on procedural governance and risk-based thresholds. The study proposes a Maqasid AI Filter Framework (MAFF) as a preliminary operational governance model with concrete policy recommendations for regulatory bodies in Islamic financial contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofiane Fellah & Mebarka Bedarnia & Oulfa M’ziou, 2026. "Artificial Intelligence Ethics in Islamic Society: Towards an Integrative Approach between Maqasid al-Shariah and International Standards for AI Governance," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research,, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6239-711-8_4
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6239-711-8_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6239-711-8_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.