IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6239-709-5_42.html

Comparison of an Optimal Portfolio Performance on the Jakarta Islamic Index 70 and IDX Basic Materials

Author

Listed:
  • Andi Marwah

    (Hasanuddin University)

Abstract

This study aims to measure portfolio performance reviewed from three approaches based on the Sharpe method, Treynor method, and Jensen method. This study examines whether the Single Index Model can produce an optimal portfolio on the Jakarta Islamic Index 70 (JII70) and IDX Basic Materials (IDX IC-B) to determine the better stock portfolio for the period 2019–2024. The selection of this research sample was used based on the purposive random sampling technique that meet the sample selection criteria. The data analysis technique used in this study is descriptive with a quantitative approach, and the analysis tool used is Microsoft Excel. The test results based on the performance measurement of the stock portfolio in the JII70 using the Sharpe method is 0,1793, the Treynor method is -0,1474, and the Jensen method is 0,2443. Meanwhile, for the IDX IC-B using the Sharpe is 0,0030, the Treynor is 0,1181, and the Jensen is 0,2151. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the performance of the JII70 portfolio is better than the IDX IC-B, as the values of the three indices calculated show that the JII70 has higher values compared to the IDX IC-B.

Suggested Citation

  • Andi Marwah, 2026. "Comparison of an Optimal Portfolio Performance on the Jakarta Islamic Index 70 and IDX Basic Materials," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research,, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6239-709-5_42
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6239-709-5_42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6239-709-5_42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.