IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-94-6239-699-9_16.html

Doing Nothing? Carbon Abatement Decisions of Pure Monopoly Airlines under a Dynamic Aviation Carbon Tax

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Xu

    (Civil Aviation University of China, School of Management and Economics)

  • Longfei Dong

    (Civil Aviation University of China, School of Transportation Science and Engineering)

  • Junwei Zhang

    (Civil Aviation University of China, School of Transportation Science and Engineering)

Abstract

The aviation carbon tax is a critical policy instrument for emission reductions, yet its impact on airline operations remains under explored. This study investigates the optimal capacity and abatement investment decisions of a monopolistic airline under a dynamic aviation carbon tax. By constructing and solving three models—no tax, tax without abatement, and tax with abatement—we derive equilibrium solutions revealing key insights. When initial carbon allowances are sufficient, the tax policy becomes ineffective. When allowances are scarce, the airline’s abatement level and cost become critical determinants of its optimal strategy. Interestingly, a larger market size or lower abatement cost may paradoxically reduce the airline’s tolerance for the carbon tax. Moreover, under sufficiently high tax rates, even environmentally conscious green airlines may find it optimal to abandon abatement investments altogether. This research provides theoretical contributions and practical insights for airlines in countries with low carbon regulations as they navigate increasingly stringent aviation carbon tax policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Xu & Longfei Dong & Junwei Zhang, 2026. "Doing Nothing? Carbon Abatement Decisions of Pure Monopoly Airlines under a Dynamic Aviation Carbon Tax," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research,, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6239-699-9_16
    DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6239-699-9_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6239-699-9_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.