Author
Abstract
This research applies a Monte Carlo simulation approach to analyze financial risks in an industrial rooftop solar power project, aligning with global energy transition goals and the net-zero commitment by 2050. Evaluating risk exposure is crucial for industrial enterprises adopting onsite renewable energy. Focusing on the rooftop solar project at FIT Voltaira, the study uses Crystal Ball software to simulate scenarios by assigning probability distributions to key input variables: solar energy yield, electricity price, and initial investment cost. The results show an 87.56% probability of achieving a positive Net Present Value (NPV) and an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) above the minimum acceptable rate, illustrating both potential opportunities and downside risks. Sensitivity analysis indicates that investment cost, solar yield, and electricity price are the most influential drivers of financial uncertainty. The study offers practical insights for investors—such as securing fixed-price EPC contracts and optimizing system design—while also providing a probabilistic evidence base for emerging rooftop solar policies, including the integration of carbon credits. Research purpose: This research evaluates the financial efficiency and risk management of industrial rooftop solar power projects in Vietnam, aligning with net-zero goals. Monte Carlo simulation is used to assess financial viability, providing appropriate investment policy recommendations in a high-risk environment. Research motivation: Global energy transition and Vietnam’s net-zero pledge drive urgent demand for industrial rooftop solar, reducing costs and fostering sustainable development. Fluctuations in key financial factors create significant risks. This study addresses a gap in analyzing these projects amidst new Net Zero 2050 challenges. Research design, approach, and method: This study employs a Monte Carlo simulation approach using Crystal Ball software to analyze a rooftop solar project at FIT Voltaira Vietnam factory. Key uncertain input variables—solar energy yield, EVN’s electricity price, and initial investment costs—were assigned probability distributions. The model was run 10,000 times to evaluate financial indicators. Main findings: Baseline analysis showed high feasibility (NPV>0, IRR 16% > 13% MARR, 8-year payback). Monte Carlo simulation confirmed high profitability potential, with an 87.56% probability of positive NPV and IRR exceeding MARR. Sensitivity analysis highlighted investment cost, solar yield, and electricity price as the most significant risk factors. Practical/managerial implications: Investors should prioritize controlling initial investment costs (e.g., fixed-price EPC contracts), maximizing solar yield (optimal design, monitoring), and aligning to electricity prices. This research also provides a scientific basis for Vietnam’s evolving rooftop solar legal framework, emphasizing detailed financial analyses and new carbon credit incentives.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-94-6239-622-7_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.