IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/advbcp/978-2-38476-585-0_62.html

Analysis of Differences Between China’s Gaokao System and the U.S. College Admissions System and Suggestions for Improvement

In: Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Hybrid Commerce, Human Capital, and Economic Dynamics (ICHCH 2025)

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoke Lu

    (Ready Global Academy)

Abstract

Differences in higher education admission systems are due to differences in national context. Globally, there are two types of systems: merit-based and holistic admissions. Countries such as the UK, South Korea and China tend to place greater emphasis on the score of an exam when making admissions decisions whereas other countries such as Sweden, Denmark and Germany prioritize non-cognitive skills, like Japan and the US, some countries emphasize a balanced assessment using different methods such as exam score, recommendation letters, extracurricular activities, and interview for university admission. China and the US have the greatest differences and, therefore, represent this type of circumstance most completely. In order to facilitate better comprehension, this paper first outlines the reasons behind the different circumstances and methods utilized for admissions in China and the US; secondly, analyzes drawbacks within each side; finally, offering localized solutions through absorption of respective strengths from each approach to that end.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoke Lu, 2026. "Analysis of Differences Between China’s Gaokao System and the U.S. College Admissions System and Suggestions for Improvement," Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, in: Ata Jahangir Moshayedi (ed.), Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Hybrid Commerce, Human Capital, and Economic Dynamics (ICHCH 2025), pages 560-564, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-2-38476-585-0_62
    DOI: 10.2991/978-2-38476-585-0_62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:advbcp:978-2-38476-585-0_62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.