IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/adschp/978-3-031-15149-1_9.html

Poverty, Inequality and Development Studies with Machine Learning

In: Econometrics with Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Walter Sosa-Escudero

    (Universidad de San Andres, CONICET and Centro de Estudios para el Desarrollo Humano (CEDHUdeSA))

  • Maria Victoria Anauati

    (Universidad de San Andres CONICET and CEDH-UdeSA)

  • Wendy Brau

    (Universidad de San Andres and CEDH-UdeSA)

Abstract

This chapter provides a hopefully complete ‘ecosystem’ of the literature on the use of machine learning (ML) methods for poverty, inequality, and development (PID) studies. It proposes a novel taxonomy to classify the contributions of ML methods and new data sources used in this field. Contributions lie in two main categories. The first is making available better measurements and forecasts of PID indicators in terms of frequency, granularity, and coverage. The availability of more granular measurements has been the most extensive contribution of ML to PID studies. The second type of contribution involves the use of ML methods as well as new data sources for causal inference. Promising ML methods for improving existent causal inference techniques have been the main contribution in the theoretical arena, whereas taking advantage of the increased availability of new data sources to build or improve the outcome variable has been the main contribution in the empirical front. These inputs would not have been possible without the improvement in computational power.

Suggested Citation

  • Walter Sosa-Escudero & Maria Victoria Anauati & Wendy Brau, 2022. "Poverty, Inequality and Development Studies with Machine Learning," Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics, in: Felix Chan & László Mátyás (ed.), Econometrics with Machine Learning, chapter 0, pages 291-335, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:adschp:978-3-031-15149-1_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-15149-1_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bergstrom, Katy & Dodds, William & Lacoste, Nicholas & Rios, Juan, 2026. "Estimating the welfare cost of labor supply frictions," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    2. Natalia Pecorari & Jose Cuesta, 2024. "Citizen Participation and Political Trust in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Machine Learning Approach," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(5), pages 1227-1252, October.
    3. Sherin Kularathne & Amanda Perera & Namal Rathnayake & Upaka Rathnayake & Yukinobu Hoshino, 2024. "Analyzing the impact of socioeconomic indicators on gender inequality in Sri Lanka: A machine learning-based approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Ferreira, Francisco H. G. & Brunori, Paolo, 2024. "Inherited inequality, meritocracy, and the purpose of economic growth," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126263, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Pecorari,Natalia Gisel & Cuesta Leiva,Jose Antonio, 2023. "Citizen Participation and Political Trust in Latin America and the Caribbean : AMachine Learning Approach," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10335, The World Bank.
    6. Adriana Uquillas & Stéfano Cruz, 2025. "Hybrid neural network with image caption generator for spatio-temporal income inequality and poverty estimation: A case study in Ecuador," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 45(4), pages 573-607, December.
    7. Nora Lustig & Andrea Vigorito, 2025. "The "Missing Rich" in Household Surveys: Causes and Correction Approaches Extended Version with Technical Appendixes," Working Papers 2512, Tulane University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:adschp:978-3-031-15149-1_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.