IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pes/ecchap/21.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

TOPSIS Analysis of Changes of Quality of Human Capital in European Union Countries

In: ICEM 2016 International Scientific Conference Economics and Management. Smart and Efficient Economy: Preparation for Future Innovative Economy. 21 International Scientific Conference. Proceedings of Selected Papers

Author

Listed:
  • Adam P. Balcerzak

    (Nicolaus Copernicus University)

  • Michal Bernard Pietrzak

    (Nicolaus Copernicus University)

Abstract

Purpose of the article In the case of highly developed countries quality of human capital (QHC) is currently considered as one of the most important factors determining international competitiveness and growth of economies. The fundamental role of the QHC can be seen in the EU policy documents such as Europe 2020 strategy. In this context the main purpose of the article is to evaluate the QHC in the EU countries at the macroeconomic level and to make comparison between so called “new” member states that joined the EU after the year 2004 and the “old” EU countries. Methodology/methods QHC is considered as a multidimensional phenomenon. As a result, in the research Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was applied. The method enables to evaluate the objects in terms of economic phenomena that have multidimensional character based on the set of detailed economic attributes (variables). In the research eight diagnostic variables were used. The synthetic index describing the relative level of QHC in the analysed economies was estimated, which enabled to propose a rating of the countries and group them into homogenous subsets. Scientific aim The scientific aim of the article was to evaluate the progress obtained by the “new” member states after joining the EU. As a result, two ratings grouping the EU countries from the once with the highest level of QHC to the once with its lowest level in the year 2004 and 2012 were determined. Findings The comparison of the ratings in the year 2004 and 2012 shows that most of the “new” member states have made a significant progress in the analysed period. Conclusions The conducted multidimensional research enabled to quantify QHC in the EU countries in the year 2004 and 2012 with application of multidimensional perspective. As a result it enabled to evaluate the changes of that phenomenon in the period and to point the countries that are the leaders in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam P. Balcerzak & Michal Bernard Pietrzak, 2016. "TOPSIS Analysis of Changes of Quality of Human Capital in European Union Countries," Chapters, in: I. Simberova & O. Zizlavsky & F. Milichovsky (ed.),ICEM 2016 International Scientific Conference Economics and Management. Smart and Efficient Economy: Preparation for Future Innovative Economy. 21 Int, edition 1, volume 1, pages 80-85, Institute of Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:pes:ecchap:21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.badania-gospodarcze.pl/images/chapters/21.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Quality of Human Capital; macroeconomic perspective; TOPSIS method; European Union countries;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • E24 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution; Aggregate Human Capital; Aggregate Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pes:ecchap:21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam P. Balcerzak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibgtopl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.