IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/stuchp/978-3-031-94009-5_9.html

Implementation of Hungary’s Country-Specific Recommendations in European Comparison

In: The Path of Hungary's EU Membership

Author

Listed:
  • András Bíró-Nagy

    (HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Institute for Political Science)

Abstract

This chapter reviews the functioning of the European Semester and examines how the Orbán government—in power since the system’s introduction in 2011—has responded to the European Commission’s country-specific recommendations. The national-level analysis of these recommendations demonstrates that European integration influences member states not only through robust, binding instruments and exclusive competences but also via softer policy coordination mechanisms. According to the Commission’s long-term assessment, Hungary achieved at least some progress on half of the recommendations by 2019, a performance comparable to that of other Visegrád countries. However, since then, the Hungarian government’s commitment to implementing the recommendations has sharply declined, with Hungary ranking last in the European Union since 2019. No progress has been made in reducing dependence on fossil fuels, enhancing the predictability of the regulatory environment, or strengthening the social safety net and social dialogue. Furthermore, public policy cooperation between the European Commission and the Hungarian government is hampered by disputes that extend beyond differences in policy substance or governmental priorities, evolving into an increasingly politicized process.

Suggested Citation

  • András Bíró-Nagy, 2025. "Implementation of Hungary’s Country-Specific Recommendations in European Comparison," Studies in Economic Transition, in: András Bíró-Nagy & Gergő Medve-Bálint (ed.), The Path of Hungary's EU Membership, chapter 0, pages 235-257, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:stuchp:978-3-031-94009-5_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-94009-5_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:stuchp:978-3-031-94009-5_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.