IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/psmchp/978-3-032-25364-4_9.html

Examining the Preparedness of Kenya’s Marine Fisheries and Maritime Transport Sectors for the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Brigid K. Gesami

    (University of Cape Coast, Department of Applied Economics, School of Economics
    University of Cape Coast, Africa Center for Excellence in Coastal Resilience (ACECoR))

  • Jacob Nunoo

    (University of Cape Coast, Department of Applied Economics, School of Economics)

  • Stephen Edward Moore

    (University of Cape Coast, Department of Mathematics)

  • Joshua Sebu

    (University of Cape Coast, Department of Data Science & Economic Policy, School of Economics)

Abstract

The rate of artificial intelligence (AI) innovation is accelerating in all sectors worldwide, but its penetration into Kenya’s marine fisheries and maritime transport sectors remains limited and incipient. Attaining the potential for AI benefits, including efficiency and sustainability, depends on the sectors’ capacity in infrastructure, skills, regulatory environments, and institutional preparedness. Under-preparedness has the potential to result in risks such as the depletion of resources and disruption in the supply chain. Using an evaluation analysis, the preparedness level for AI in Kenya’s maritime transport and marine fisheries sectors is analyzed to determine gaps and feed into strategies for responsible and inclusive AI adoption. The research used an exploratory mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis with qualitative sentiment analysis from 56 purposively selected stakeholders in Nairobi County, Kenya, comprised of ministries, maritime agencies, ICT companies, and fisheries organizations. The preparedness was measured in three pillars adapted from the Cisco 2024 AI preparedness index. Quantitative analysis uncovered marked differences in the two sectors’ AI readiness. Weighed against AI readiness scores, the Marine Fisheries sector scored 70%, placing it in the “Chasers” (above-average readiness) category, while the Maritime Transport sector scored 54%, putting it in the “Followers” (below-average readiness) category. Sector-affiliated institutions ranked higher at 74%, still in the “Chasers” group. Statistical tests show that the duo-sectoral institutions and the Marine Fisheries sector are substantially ready for the adoption of AI than the Maritime Transport sector. Qualitative sentiment analysis gave deeper insights into the overall positive sentiment for Data and Infrastructure, moderate for Technology and Skills, and lower for Management and Governance. The study concludes that while there are incidences of advanced readiness in some institutions, Kenya’s overall AI preparedness in its maritime transport and marine fisheries sectors is uneven, with the Maritime Transport sector being the least prepared.

Suggested Citation

  • Brigid K. Gesami & Jacob Nunoo & Stephen Edward Moore & Joshua Sebu, 2026. "Examining the Preparedness of Kenya’s Marine Fisheries and Maritime Transport Sectors for the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence," Palgrave Studies in Maritime Economics,, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:psmchp:978-3-032-25364-4_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-25364-4_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:psmchp:978-3-032-25364-4_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.