IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/psitcp/978-3-319-42076-9_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The “Reputation Approach” and the Justificatory Function of Economic Calculation. Some Critical Reflections on Monika Pohle Fraser’s Analysis of Risk Management Techniques in the Nineteenth Century

In: Decision Taking, Confidence and Risk Management in Banks from Early Modernity to the 20th Century

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Knake

    (Universität Bielefeld)

Abstract

In this article, Sebastian Knake gives an interpretation of formal risk calculations as a source of justification for industrial investment decisions in the case of fundamental uncertainty. Monika Pohle Fraser’s historical analysis of the risk management practices of German and French banks in the nineteenth century provides a basis. Knake first presents the central results of Pohle Fraser’s unpublished dissertation and discusses the theoretical implications of her conclusions. Knake then compares her approach with the theoretical assumptions of the justification theory included in the ‘Économie des Conventions’. He proposes the analysis of justification discourses as a way to better understand the processes that lead to investment decisions. Finally, Knake tests his proposal on a short example from his own empirical work on the Braunschweigische Staatsbank in the 1950s.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Knake, 2017. "The “Reputation Approach” and the Justificatory Function of Economic Calculation. Some Critical Reflections on Monika Pohle Fraser’s Analysis of Risk Management Techniques in the Nineteenth Century," Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance, in: Korinna Schönhärl (ed.), Decision Taking, Confidence and Risk Management in Banks from Early Modernity to the 20th Century, pages 147-171, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:psitcp:978-3-319-42076-9_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42076-9_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:psitcp:978-3-319-42076-9_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.