IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/psitcp/978-1-137-36954-3_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Lady Is for Turning, 1979–82

In: UK Monetary Policy from Devaluation to Thatcher, 1967–82

Author

Listed:
  • Duncan Needham

    (University of Cambridge)

Abstract

The Conservatives won the May 1979 election with a majority of 43 after enjoying the biggest electoral swing since 1945. The election manifesto had set out ‘a broad framework for the recovery of our country, based not on dogma, but on reason, on common sense, above all on the liberty of the people under the law’.2 There were general commitments to published monetary targets and a lower Public Sector Borrowing Requirement (PSBR). There was a pledge to cut income tax ‘at all levels’, and a promise to ‘simplify’ VAT. There was a passage on ‘responsible pay bargaining’, long on the dangers of irresponsible pay bargaining, but short on specific commitments. There was no mention of the exchange rate. In short, the manifesto was an uneasy compromise between the ideologically attractive and the politically feasible, which, despite the claims made for a radical break in 1979, contained little, in economic terms, that the outgoing Labour Chancellor could have fundamentally disagreed with. The overarching aim was much the same as before — sustainable growth, to be achieved by lowering inflation and restoring incentives. As Tim Congdon points out, ‘The structure and form of policy, with the focus on quantified limits to monetary growth and the PSBR, were identical to those in the last two-and-a-half years of Denis Healey’s Chancellorship’.3

Suggested Citation

  • Duncan Needham, 2014. "The Lady Is for Turning, 1979–82," Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance, in: UK Monetary Policy from Devaluation to Thatcher, 1967–82, chapter 5, pages 134-168, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:psitcp:978-1-137-36954-3_6
    DOI: 10.1057/9781137369543_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:psitcp:978-1-137-36954-3_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.