IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-349-07101-2_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Processes of Good Industrial Relations

In: Good Industrial Relations

Author

Listed:
  • John Purcell

Abstract

The proponents of structural reform emphasise that the creation of a formal system of industrial relations in the workplace or at company level is the most effective way to achieve good industrial relations. The benefits seem so extensive that surely all men and women of goodwill in industry would be bound to adopt and seek to maintain a system of this sort? Why then do we still encounter difficulties characterised by workplace disorder? Is it because of the British ‘indifference to the notion of highly structured institutions’, as Marsh has suggested (1973: 163). Or is it that the experience of day-to-day industrial relations, of coping, if only just, has led the parties to assume ‘that there is nothing to manage or administer since all is improvisation; that it is impossible, and even undesirable, to extract … any coherent strain of policy, or even any programme, of developing relationships between workers and management’ (ibid: 171)? Or is it that what the structural reformers were really concerned with was a radical change in attitudes and in the quality of inter-party and interpersonal relationships which were somehow assumed to flow from the adoption of new structures?

Suggested Citation

  • John Purcell, 1981. "The Processes of Good Industrial Relations," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Good Industrial Relations, chapter 2, pages 29-59, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-07101-2_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-07101-2_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emma Hughes & Tony Dobbins, 2021. "Frontier of control struggles in British and Irish public transport," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(3), pages 327-344, September.
    2. Richard Hyman, 1987. "Strategy or Structure? Capital, Labour and Control," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 1(1), pages 25-55, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-07101-2_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.