IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-137-50985-7_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Commentaries on methodological practice

In: Formulating Research Methods for Information Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Michael D. Myers

    (University of Auckland Business School)

  • Allen S. Lee

    (Virginia Commonwealth University)

  • Robert D. Galliers

    (Bentley University)

  • Joe Nandhakumar

    (University of Warwick)

  • Harry Scarbrough

    (University of Warwick)

  • Matt Germonprez

    (University of Wisconsin — Eau Claire)

  • Rajeev Sharma

    (University of Wollongong)

Abstract

In their research essay, Davison and Martinsons (2011) criticise the ‘methodological monism’ and narrowness of information systems (IS) research. They suggest that the use of a rather parsimonious set of research methods, notably those that follow the positivist tradition, demonstrates a significant degree of methodological exclusiveness. They claim that this exclusivity is counterproductive to good IS research and unethical. They make four key arguments in support of their position. They conclude by saying that the methodological monism of IS research is responsible for the ‘impoverished contribution of IS research to organisational realities’. They say this situation represents ‘a malaise that lies at the heart of the IS discipline’ and contributes to the lack of relevance of IS research. They make some recommendations as to how this malaise might be overcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael D. Myers & Allen S. Lee & Robert D. Galliers & Joe Nandhakumar & Harry Scarbrough & Matt Germonprez & Rajeev Sharma, 2015. "Commentaries on methodological practice," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Leslie P. Willcocks & Chris Sauer & Mary C. Lacity (ed.), Formulating Research Methods for Information Systems, chapter 5, pages 112-148, Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-50985-7_6
    DOI: 10.1057/9781137509857_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-50985-7_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.