IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-137-44352-6_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Evaluating ICT Project Risk: An Exploratory Study of UK and Czech Republic Practices

In: The FAP Model and Its Application in the Appraisal of ICT Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Lefley

    (University of Hradec Králové)

Abstract

Although business is about accepting risks, the identification and assessment of project-specific risk is possibly one of the most controversial topics in project management theory and practice. While attempts have been made to include risk assessment as part of the financial appraisal process, this appears, to some extent, to have been unsuccessful. Baldwin1 argues in fact that ‘the rate-of-return figure should remain inviolate and should be complemented by a secondary factor indicative of the risk, thereby keeping sight of both economic effect and risk’. Risk and financial evaluations are two separate factors, and each will have an influence over the other, but their assessment should remain separate.2 It is important, however, when allowing for risk in appraising capital projects to make it not merely more difficult to accept a project.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Lefley, 2015. "Evaluating ICT Project Risk: An Exploratory Study of UK and Czech Republic Practices," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The FAP Model and Its Application in the Appraisal of ICT Projects, chapter 4, pages 68-81, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-44352-6_4
    DOI: 10.1057/9781137443526_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-44352-6_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.