IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-137-03432-8_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A New Perspective on Sraffa

In: Towards a New Understanding of Sraffa

Author

Listed:
  • Ajit Sinha

Abstract

In the ‘Preface’ to the Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities (PCMC) Sraffa makes four specific remarks that are essential to understanding his book. These remarks are: (i) do not think in terms of equi-librium of demand and supply; (ii) there is no assumption regarding returns to scale; (iii) this standpoint is the standpoint of classical political economy from Adam Smith to Ricardo; and (iv) this book is a prelude to a critique of modern economic theory and if the propositions of the book are proved to be correct then it might provide a foundation for launching a critique of the modern economic theory. Unfortunately, none of these clear-cut statements by Sraffa have been given careful attention either by his followers or his critics in interpreting his book. In this chapter, I discuss the above four points to develop a new perspective on Sraffa’s book. In Section ‘Equilibrium of supply and demand and returns of scale’, I take up points (i) and (ii) and try to motivate a new interpretation of Sraffa’s equations. In Sections ‘A standpoint of classical political economy’ and ‘The foundation for a new critique of modern economic theory’, points (iii) and (iv) are taken up respectively, albeit in a highly brief and provisional manner. Here I have decided to state my position without giving it too much of a controversial air, as I have already presented my refutations of the received interpretations else-where (Sinha, 2007, 2010, 2012; Sinha and Dupertuis, 2009a, b).

Suggested Citation

  • Ajit Sinha, 2014. "A New Perspective on Sraffa," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Riccardo Bellofiore & Scott Carter (ed.), Towards a New Understanding of Sraffa, chapter 5, pages 81-93, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-03432-8_5
    DOI: 10.1057/9781137034328_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ajit Sinha, 2015. "A Reflection on the Samuelson-Garegnani Debate," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-48, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-03432-8_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.