IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-0-230-29127-0_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Political Economy of Work and Skill in Australia: Insights From Recent Applied Research

In: Beyond Skill

Author

Listed:
  • John Buchanan
  • Michelle Jakubauskas

Abstract

One of the major legacies of the ‘new right’ ascendancy was the denial of choices about the future. As Margaret Thatcher asserted frequently in the early 1980s: ‘there is no alternative’ (TINA) to increased reliance on market mechanisms. What once had to be asserted subsequently became conventional policy wisdom. We call this the TINA syndrome (see Watson et al, 2003). Authors such as Thomas Frank (2000) have shown this is now part of wider ‘market populism’ with deep roots in civil society.

Suggested Citation

  • John Buchanan & Michelle Jakubauskas, 2010. "The Political Economy of Work and Skill in Australia: Insights From Recent Applied Research," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Jane Bryson (ed.), Beyond Skill, chapter 3, pages 32-57, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-29127-0_3
    DOI: 10.1057/9780230291270_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Dalziel, 2015. "Regional skill ecosystems to assist young people making education employment linkages in transition from school to work," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(1), pages 53-66, February.
    2. Paul Dalziel, 2019. "Wellbeing economics in public policy: A distinctive Australasian contribution?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 30(4), pages 478-497, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-29127-0_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.